Friday, February 01, 2013

WOMEN & THE DEATH PENALTY

WOMEN & THE DEATH PENALTY: 

ARE WOMEN OVER-REPRESENTED ON DEATH ROW?
From:  Dudley Sharp, independent researcher, death penalty expert, former opponent, 832-439-2113, CV at bottom   
 
EXECUTIONS

8,218 men were sent to death row (1973-2010), with 1222 executed or 15% (1). 174 women were sent to death row since 1973, with 12 executed or 7% (1). 
 
If only 3.8% fewer of the total men and 4% more of the total women, sentenced to death were executed, that would be exactly the same execution rate - 11%.  A 3.8%-4% disparity rate is tiny, particularly, over the 37-year period, 1973-2010.
 
DEATH SENTENCES

Only 2% of the jurors' votes can change the sentence from death to life without parole (2).

Women are much less likely to commit all crimes, inclusive of murder, than are men. When combining murder, with the secondary aggravating circumstances, that create a death penalty offense, the disparity between men and women grows, tremendously.
 
In addition, both the higher aggravated level of the capital murder and the volume  of the criminal record, of the capital murderer, have well known effects upon increasing the probability of being given a death sentence, with women having lower levels, for both.

As a general and dominant rule, capital offences are murders plus secondary aggravating circumstances, such as rape, robbery and/or burglary.

Women committing rape/murders appears to be near 0%.

Men committed 476,937 rapes, robberies and burglaries, women 47,357 or a 10:1 ratio. From 1976-94, men committed 7 times as many murders as women, or 7:1. (BJS, Sourcebook ‘94, BJS ‘95, tb.4.9 and 3.22).

It may be, statistically, predictable that men are, by a 70:1 ratio (10:1 X 7:1), more likely to be on death row than are women. I multiplied the murder ratios with the secondary aggravating circumstance ratios to get the 70:1, This is not the proper way to come up with an accurate result.

However, it does provide a broad ballpark of what the ratio might be, if a detailed study was undertaken.

As of 12/31/10 (1): 3100 men and 58 women were on death row, or a ratio of 53:1, with woman making up 1.8% of the total.

The 53:1 ratio indicates that women may be on death row in greater numbers than we would expect or similar to what we would predict.

In fact, the ratio of 70:1 means that we would predict that men would be 98.6% of those on death row, women 1.4%, or a lower percentage than women, currently, on death row.

My analysis is much more proper than what anti-death penalty Prof. Victor Streib does, which is to, wrongly, make the comparison within the context of all murders, when he should be using only death penalty eligible murders, as he well knows.

Streib is the most noted expert on women and the death penalty and Streib is very aware of what murders should be used in this evaluation. He just doesn't use them.

Streib writes:

“while women comprise 13 percent of U.S. murder arrests, they account for only 2 percent of the death sentences, and make up only 1.5 percent of all persons presently on death row.” 
That 1.5% is nearly exact with the 1.4% I predict within that 70:1 ratio.

Strieb's “only 2 percent" is higher than we would predict.

Streib wrongly uses “murder” arrests, which are not “capital” murders, but all murders. He is not even speaking of the proper crimes for a death sentence. 
 
Strieb is aware of the intentional error he is presenting. He is anti-death penalty and is an accepted expert on women and the death penalty. 
 
Media, very likely, never questions nor corrects his obvious error. You might ask "How often does Strieb correct it?"

The correct context is capital murders, not all murders, as he and media well know.

I say that only about 10% of all murders are death penalty eligible. Some say 15-20%.

In other words, if women account for 13% of murder arrests, we would expect them to represent 1.3% of those on death row, nearly the exact percentage Streib states we should expect. Again, nearly exact with my 1.4% predicted with that 70:1 ratio.

When using capital murders, the number of women on death row are what we would expect, if not more than expected.

Currently, women make up 1.8% of those on death row, more that what we might predict.

That 70:1 ratio is looking pretty close, maybe just as it should.

Currently, there are about 58 women on death row, certainly within any reasonable margin of error, particularly given any random chance disparity in sentencing, as well as the crucial differences within and between all cases.

Streib was wrong as he knows, to use all murders. I was correct to look at capital murders.

Properly evaluating capital murders, it turns out that the 1.3%-2% of Streib is not only where the death row numbers should be, they also match up surprisingly well with my rough 70:1 ratio and the 53:1 ratio which we have, today (2010).

 
1) Capital Punishment, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cp10st.pdf

2) Texas Death Penalty Procedures
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/11/texas-death-penalty-procedures.html

also review

THE DEATH PENALTY: LEAST ARBITRARY & CAPRICIOUS:
Both the guilty & the innocent have the greatest protections
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-death-penalty-neither-arbitrary-nor.html

======
600+ pro death penalty quotes from murder victim's families &
3300+ from some of the greatest thinkers in history
====== 
======
 
Additional research,w/sources, w/fact checking/vetting & critical thinking, as required of everyone.  
 
The Death Penalty: Justice & Saving More Innocents
and
Students, Academics & Journalists: Death Penalty Research
======
 
Partial CV