Sunday, December 07, 2025

Anti-death Penalty Conservatives

Anti-death Penalty Conservatives

From: Dudley Sharp, independent researcher, death penalty expert, former opponent, 832-439-2113, CV at bottom

Preface

The alleged conservatives supporting death penalty repeal are either not conservative and/or use only anti-death penalty taking points, without fact checking and vetting, or hide that, as fully detailed (1).

So far, that is all I have found. I am happy to consider others.

All anti-death penalty claims rebutted here (1).

I was anti-death penalty until I fact checked and vetted both sides of the debate, for 2 years (1).
======

Full Rebuttal: DEMETRIUS MINOR, National Manager, Conservatives Concerned About The Death Penalty (CCADP)

The CCADP is owned and controlled by Equal Justice USA, a well known liberal group, financed by George Soros and is a defund the police group.

Full Rebuttal: Hannah Cox, National Manager, Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty

Few Conservatives Embrace Anti Death Penalty Deceptions

Rebuttal to Ron Paul at
Few Conservatives Embrace Anti Death Penalty Deceptions

Rebuttal to Richard A. Viguerie's "A conservative argues for abolishing the death penalty"
https://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2013/10/rebuttal-to-richard-vigueries-when.html

More rebuttal to Viguerie in the comment section, as
Dudley Sharp | January 27, 2010 3:32 AM | Reply

(Alleged conservative) Rep. McDugle is a Total Blank on Richard Glossip's "Actual Innocence" - Why?

Conservatives Concerned About The Death Penalty:
Just another dishonest anti death penalty group


======

FN

1) Research, w/sources, w/fact checking/vetting & critical thinking, as required of everyone in a public policy debate and which rebut all anti-death penalty claims.
 
The media/academic norm is to use anti-death penalty material, refuse to fact check or vet it and avoid all pro-death penalty research and experts, or pretend that is the case. How will you know that is true? You haven't seen this material, prior.
 
The Death Penalty: Justice & Saving More Innocents
and
Students, Academics & Journalists: Death Penalty Research
(7 pro-death penalty experts are included)

600+ pro death penalty quotes from murder victim's families &
3300+ from some of the greatest thinkers in history
http://prodpquotes.info/ 
====== 

======
 
Partial CV

Posted by at

Academic Disaster: Law Professor Corinna Barrett Lain

Academic Disaster:  
U of Richmond, Law Professor Corinna Barrett Lain, U of Richmond Law Review, as other law reviews,  & U of Richmond School of Law: A Compilation
by Dudley Sharp, independent researcher, (pro) death penalty expert, former opponent, 832-439-2113, CV at bottom

To all at U of Richmond, the book tours, law reviews and all others, as detailed in 1a,b,c, below and many, many more.
        
Preface

         With research, fact checking and vetting, very obvious and easy critical thinking one finds that Lain, only, included that which would promote an anti-death penalty script, which is how she, easily and constantly, left out everything which contradicted her book, as per her book tour and the book reviews. Obvious and, easily, confirmed, as throughout my writings and not rebutted. 
       Classic anti-death penalty FEMS (fraud, error and/or mis-directions), as detailed, the example the University is setting for their students and for academia.

       How did the University make it worse?:

       Instead of condemnation and correction,  The U of Richmond School of Law and Law Review doubled down with a public symposium "Advancing Abolition: Anti-Death Penalty Advocacy in Regressive Times" on Oct 3, 2025 featuring Profs Bergen and Lain, previously rebutted, as well known by those institutions.
     The ethics lesson for students and academia could not be worse. Intentional and obvious.
     Will the University right this ethics ship? By their example, they will sink it.

(If you would like me to rebut and/or clarify the symposium speakers, let me know where you will commit to publishing that, within the university's publications)

=====-
There are a number of  groups dealing with ethics in academia, which I will review, later. I suggest U of Richmond work with them.
======

1) Full rebuttal to Lain's book, as per her book tours and the book reviews:

Read, in order

a) edit update
The Untold Secrets of Prof. Corinna Lain
https://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2025/05/the-untold-secrets-of-prof-corinna-lain.html

b) edit update
Rebuttal of Lethal Injection "Expert", Corinna Lain

c) edit update
Rebuttal: Secrets of the Killing State: The Untold Story of Lethal Injection

d) Media, Prof. Lain & Dr. Zivot Disaster:
Nitrogen Hypoxia & Scientific American

e) Dr. Joel Zivot - Anti-Death Penalty Activist: A Compilation
https://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2025/05/dr-joel-zivot-anti-death-penalty.html

f) Lethal Injection & Nitrogen Hypoxia: Controversies Resolved 

g)  No Pain in Lethal Injection, By Dudley Sharp,  Justice Matters, Dakota Voice, 8/24/2006

h) Veterinary Claims a Distortion of Reality: Human Lethal Injection

2) This, below, will be helpful, if fact checking and vetting is of interest in future death penalty topics and rebuts some of the other, non execution methods, references from Lain's book, book tour and book reviews:

       Research, w/sources, w/fact checking/vetting & critical thinking, as required of everyone in a public policy debate and which rebut all anti-death penalty claims. 
     The media/academic norm is to use anti-death penalty material, refuse to fact check or vet it and avoid all pro-death penalty research and experts, or act as if that is the case. How will you know that is true? You haven't seen this material, prior.  

a) The Death Penalty: Justice & Saving More Innocents
b) Students, Academics & Journalists: Death Penalty Research 
7 pro-death penalty experts included
c) 600+ pro death penalty quotes from murder victim's families & 3300+ from some of the greatest thinkers in history   http://prodpquotes.info/ 
======

Partial CV

Posted by at
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)