Victim Services
If you can't find, exactly, what you need call your closest victim's organization and they will help.
This Weblog or "Blog" contains articles, events and opinions that support capital punishment in North Carolina and elsewhere. Author(s) of the contents are exercising their rights to free speech which unfortunately is often stifled or ignored by the media. Contrary to what you might read or hear in the news, North Carolinians should be proud that an occassional and deserved execution is allowed to proceed. - Wayne Uber
Victim Services
If you can't find, exactly, what you need call your closest victim's organization and they will help.
First published, 2001
The Death Penalty: Neither Hatred nor Revenge
From: Dudley Sharp, independent researcher, death penalty expert, former opponent, 832-439-2113, Houston, Texas, CV at bottom
Death penalty opponents say that the death penalty has a foundation in hatred and revenge. Such is a false claim.
In the US, a death sentence requires judges and jurors who have no connection to the case, the defendant must be presumed innocent unless or until found guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, the punishment options are pre-determined by the legislature and judges nor jurors have any other options, but those passed into law, and is the only sanction with super due process (1), all of which negate revenge.
The pre trial, trial. appellate and executive clemency/commutation processes offer much greater time and human resources to capital cases than they do to any other cases, meaning that the facts tell us that defendants and convicted murderers, subject to the death penalty, receive much greater care and concern than those not facing the death penalty – the opposite of a system identified with either hatred or vengeance.
Revenge requires no guilt nor a crime. The law requires both, if sanction is imposed.
Unlike revenge, those directly affected by the crime are not allowed to be fact finders in a legal case.