These are, each, examples of the mess by death penalty opponents, who happen to be judges.
compiled and written by
Dudley Sharp, independent researcher, death penalty expert, former opponent,
832-439-2113, CV at bottom
SCOTUS Justice Breyer's Errors in Death Penalty Assessment
Justice Breyer's Errors in Death Penalty Assessment
McCleskey v Kemp: SCOTUS ERROR & LEGAL DECEPTION
Do Any Law Schools Teach This Correctly and Honestly?
Duane Buck & the False Claims of Racism:
More Deceptions by Death Penalty Opponents
JUDGES AS JACKASSES: THE DEATH PENALTY
https://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2016/11/judges-as-jackasses_4.html?zx=b096e159e70ea8bd
"CNN’s Scott Jennings rips liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan for nationwide injunction hypocrisy: ‘Some of these folks really are hacks’ "
By Anna Young Published June 28, 2025, 5:57 p.m. ET
Media Disaster: The Death Penalty
HOW MEDIA MURDERS THE TRUTH
Courts, states put death penalty on life support
Media Disaster: WHY FEWER DEATH SENTENCES AND EXECUTIONS?
Fixing Ohio's Death Penalty
"Rethinking the Death Penalty", Nightline, ABCNews, 6/22/00
Interesting discussion with former Florida Supreme Court Justice Kogan, who, somehow, confused alleged innocent death row inmates released on appeal with innocent death row inmates executed.
Truly bizarre.
Death Penalty: Judge Tom Price - Dead Wrong
Published, Dallas Morning News
Justice Elsa Alcala's Death Penalty Errors
See 2) The Paula Mitchell/Judge Arthur L. Alarcón study:
Death Penalty vs Life Costs in California
about halfway down within
Death Penalty Costs: California
Judges, Solely, At Fault For California Death Penalty Disaster
Judges Responsible For Grossly Uneven Executions
More, in the same vain
"ABA's (American Bar Assn.) Proposed Moratorium Relies on Flimsy Facts",
The Texas Lawyer, March 16, 1997.
An article showing how inaccurate and misleading the American Bar Association was in their foundation in asking for a moratorium on executions.
They could not rebut.
=====
Research, w/sources, w/fact checking/vetting & critical thinking, as required of everyone in a public policy debate and which rebut all anti-death penalty claims.
The media/academic norm is to use anti-death penalty material, refuse to fact check or vet it and avoid all pro-death penalty research and experts. How will you know that is true? You haven't seen this material, prior.
a) The Death Penalty: Justice & Saving More Innocents
and
b) Students, Academics & Journalists: Death Penalty Research
(7 pro-death penalty experts are included)
600+ pro death penalty quotes from murder victim's families &
3300+ from some of the greatest thinkers in history
======
Partial CV
