Could This LAW360 Article Help Upend Journalism?
Of course not. Journalism has been upending itself, on the death penalty, for, at least, 30 years.
see Research, w/sources, w/fact checking/vetting & critical thinking, at bottom.
LAW360 answered none of the questions, below, nor informed their readers of the many journalism problems. The norm.
enter Media Disaster in the search box, for many, many more.
======
Sent January 22, 2023
edits, only for clarity, January 17, 2025
To: Jack Karp, Karin Roberts, LAW360 and all editorial staff
please forward to all LAW360 editors
please forward to all LAW360 editors
BCC: Governor Kevin Stitt
Oklahoma Legislators and staff
Attorney General John O’Connor and staff
Oklahoma Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty
Pardon and Parole Board
District Attorneys' Council
media throughout Oklahoma and CNHI Newspapers
Archdiocese of Oklahoma City
Catholic Conference of Oklahoma
RE: Could This Case Help Upend The Death Penalty In Oklahoma?, Jack Karp, LAW360, January 20, 2023
Subject: REBUTTAL: Richard Gossip's Innocence?!
From: Dudley Sharp, independent researcher, death penalty expert, former opponent, 832-439-2113, Houston, Texas, CV at bottom
Reporting? Journalism? Let's Look.
1) Why did LAW360 only interview anti-death penalty folks? They only wanted their opinions.
2) See pro death penalty experts, here (1).
3) Death Row "Innocent"/"Exoneration" frauds are in the 71-83% range, depending upon review (2). Unmentioned. Likely, 360Law never fact checked nor vetted
4) Massive, worldwide death row "innocence" frauds are well documented (2). Unmentioned.
5) Reporters should not have excluded the judicial opinions, while, only, reporting on anti-death penalty activists. Obvious and had to be intentional.
6) What adult, death penalty involved person would say:
"Three years ago (2020), I honestly did not think it was even possible to have somebody innocent on death row."?
That would be Rep. Kevib McDugle, Oklahoma House of Representatives. McDugle is an "honest" idiot or an "honest" liar and you didn't question him on that?
7) Did you happen to research this?:
Rep. Kevin McDugle's op/ed: "I believe Richard Glossip is innocent. This is why", The Oklahoman, June 26, 2022, which prompted this:
Rep. McDugle is Total Blank on Richard Glossip's "Actual Innocence" in that article. - Why? Guess.
https://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2023/05/rep-mcdugle-total-blank-on-richard.html
8) Dunham is the biggest "innocent"/"exonerated" death row fraudster in the US (2) and you didn't bring that up? On purpose? How could it be accidental?
9) Sarat is an anti-death penalty activists who happens to be an academic (3). Unmentioned.
10) After 14 years of consideration, Gossip was blank. During Glossip's 2014 clemency hearing, "Board members asked Glossip why he lied to police about (Barry Alan) Van Treese’s whereabouts after he was made aware by Sneed that Sneed had killed their boss. Glossip said at first he did not believe Sneed, but he was unable to give the board a reason as to why he did not report the crime to police." Left out. Huge negligence
11) Did you read Reed Smith's 6/7/2022 "Independent Investigation of State v. Richard E. Glossip"? The Summary and Conclusion have no mention of actual innocence. Unmentioned, as well as that Reed Smith was acting, only as defense counsel, as was obvious. Unme6ntioned, Reed Smith is an active pro criminal, pro bono group. Unmentioned. Both, on purpose? How not.
12) What's the best Reed Smith could do, for Glossip: "Unlike many cases in which the death penalty has been imposed, the evidence of petitioner’s (Glossip) guilt was not overwhelming.”
Reed Smith and LAW360 avoid the obvious. The two juries, unanimously (24-0) found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and the appellate courts have upheld that verdict, in the later, for 20 years.
13) Here are some journalists who "really" looked at the case, very early on. LAW 360, notice the title of the second.
Two truths and a lie: What records, interviews reveal about Richard Glossip’s murder conviction, CARY ASPINWALl, The Frontier, SEPTEMBER 13, 2015
Skepticism, key details missing from stories on Glossip case, ZIVA BRANSTETTER, The Frontier, AUGUST 29, 2015 HTTPS://WWW.READFRONTIER.ORG/KEY-DETAILS-MISSING-FROM-STORIES-ON-GLOSSIP-CASE/
and LAW360?
Reporting? Journalism? Part of the Defense Team?
FN
1) Students, Academics & Journalists: Death Penalty Research
2) The Death Row "Exonerated"/"Innocent" Frauds The Death Penalty: Justice & Saving More Innocents
71-83% Error Rate in Death Row "Innocent" Claims, Well Known Since 2000
3) Rebuttal: Botched Executions
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2017/01/rebuttal-botched-executions.html
http://prodpinnc.blogspot.com/2017/01/rebuttal-botched-executions.html
======
Research, w/sources, w/fact checking/vetting & critical thinking, as required of everyone in a public policy debate and which rebut all anti-death penalty claims.
The media/academic norm is to use anti-death penalty material, refuse to fact check or vet it and avoid all pro-death penalty research and experts. How will you know that is true? You haven't seen this material, prior.
a) The Death Penalty: Justice & Saving More Innocents
and
b) Students, Academics & Journalists: Death Penalty Research
(7 pro-death penalty experts are included)
600+ pro death penalty quotes from murder victim's families &
3300+ from some of the greatest thinkers in history
======
Victim Services
Partial CV, Dudley Sharp
