The Catholic Church & The Death Penalty:
12 (14) Factual Errors: 2018 CCC 2267 amendment
13th & 14th error within CCC 2264, at bottom
To: Biblical & Theological Scholars, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, The Tablet, First Things, National Catholic Reporter, America, Our Sunday Visitor, American Society of Religion, Oxford Academic,Board of Directors-Catholic Media Association, Jesuits-Global, Vatican News, Crux, Catholic News Service (Rome), Global Sisters Report, Crisis Magazine, EWTN, The Catholic Herald (UK), Catholic Digest, Congregation of St. Joseph, Today's Catholic, U.S. Catholic, The Irish Catholic, The Catholic Network, Knights of Columbus, Catholic Mobilization Network, bcc: more (primarily) Catholic institutions, worldwide, at bottom
From: Dudley Sharp, independent researcher, death penalty expert, former opponent, 832-439-2113, Houston, Texas, CV at bottom
updated 4/2024
Red is CCC
Blue is religious scholars
======
from Catechism of the Catholic Church, I. Respect for Human Life, Article 5 THE FIFTH COMMANDMENT, CHAPTER TWO YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF, SECTION TWO THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, PART THREE: LIFE IN CHRIST, (Blue Cover), 2018
======
Research, with fact checking and vetting, at bottom, with all sources.
NOTE: I, always, start with Catholic references, but, may, follow up, with Christian, non-Catholic scholars, when instructive.
=====
NOTE: I, always, start with Catholic references, but, may, follow up, with Christian, non-Catholic scholars, when instructive.
=====
Preface
The 2018 CCC 2267 amendment, is, factually and/or rationally, in error, on twelve points, which makes the 2018 2267 amendments invalid, just as the 1997 amendment was and is.
The 14 errors, inclusive of CCC 2264, and their corrections, come from the CCC, itself, and/or from other confirmable sources and/or reason, as detailed.
2267 contradicts itself, over and over, again, also making it invalid.
With error piling up against error, Saint/Pope John Paul II (SPJPII) started this Church anti-death penalty disaster, with Evangelium Vitae (EV,1995) (1), which infected both CCC 2267 Amendments (1997, 2018), resulting in, now, nearly 30 years of easily discovered errors.
Why and how?
Since 1995, the very obvious errors have been pointed out, again and again, with the Church showing no interest in correction (all fn), a tragic and frightening situation.
The errors, in fact and reason, are so clear and basic that it seems impossible for the Church and the last three Popes not to have known of them, all, along.
Although they are included, no biblical scholars nor theologians are necessary. It is simple fact and reason which illuminate those 14 errors, with biblical scholars and theologians pointing out additional errors.
SPJPII's EV and 1997 Amendment CCC 2267:
“The most reasonable conclusion to draw from this discussion is that, once again, the Catechism is simply wrong from an historical point of view. Traditional Catholic teaching did not contain the restriction enunciated by Pope John Paul II."
“The realm of human affairs is a messy one, full of at least apparent inconsistency and incoherence, and the recent teaching of the Catholic Church on capital punishment—vitiated, as I intend to show, by errors of historical fact and interpretation—is no exception.” Kevin L. Flannery S.J., Consultor of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, appointed by SPJPII (2)
2018 Amendment CCC 2267
"For the earnest believer, the derogation of the doctrinal patrimony of the Church on (the death penalty)—as though Scripture, tradition, the consensus of the Fathers, the teaching of Aquinas, and the teaching of all papacies up to the present had been swept away—is in its way as saddening as is the derogation of spiritual and moral integrity in the case of Theodore McCarrick."
"It does not aid the pastoral mission of the Church when those responsible for handing on this tradition seem to join in the dismantling of their own theological heritage." (3) Catholic theologian Steven Long
A) CCC 2267: "Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes and an acceptable, albeit extreme, means of safeguarding the common good."
Error 1) The death penalty " . . . "was (past tense) long considered an appropriate response . . . ".
Impossible.
CCC 2260: "For your lifeblood I (God) will surely require a reckoning.... Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image." "This teaching remains necessary for all time."
"surely require", "shall" and "remains necessary for all time". All eternal commands, as per Genesis 9:6. Not optional and, very, clear. There can be no past tense, with eternal, scripture. The Church knows, of course. It is, after all, CCC 2260, still, until the Church removes that, as well.
Genesis 9:5-6, is for all peoples and for all time. Somehow, the Church "missed it"? Of course not. It is still CCC 2260, until the Chruch deems it for no people and for no time.
" . . . the decree of Genesis 9:5-6 is equally enduring and cannot be separated from the other pledges and instructions of its immediate context, Genesis 8:20-9:17; . . . that is true unless specific Biblical authority can be cited for the deletion, of which there appears to be none. It seems strange that any opponents of capital punishment who professes to recognize the authority of the Bible either overlook or disregard the divine decree in this covenant with Noah; . . . capital punishment should be recognized . . . as the divinely instituted penalty for murder; The basis of this decree . . . is as enduring as God; . . . murder not only deprives a man of a portion of his earthly life . . . it is a further sin against him as a creature made in the image of God and against God Himself whose image the murderer does not respect." (4) Biblical scholar Dr. Gervas A. Carey
A few anti-death penalty biblical linguists have tried to negate the actual meaning of Genesis 9:5-6. They have failed:
Guest article by Timothy Finlay, 9/30/2023, at Edward Feser's website:
"The normal moral reason for upholding capital punishment is reverence for life itself. Indeed, this is the reason why scripture and Christian tradition have upheld it, a fact which suggests that, if anything, it may be the abolition of capital punishment which threatens to cheapen life, not its retention." (5)
Dr. J. Budziszewski, Catholic Scholar
Fr. Brian W. Harrison, O.S., St. Louis, Missouri, LETTERS, First Things, 12/18 (6) "Francis asserted, shockingly, that the death penalty is “in itself contrary to the Gospel—in sé stessa contraria al Vangelo” (emphasis added)." " . . . it is false doctrine—a monumental papal error to which Catholics should not assent." https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/12/letters
It is as if the Church is unaware that all sanctions are given because we value that which is taken away, freedom with incarceration, money or other property with fines or seizure, time and labor with community service and life with execution.
Man is God's agent, "by man shall (the murderer's) blood be shed". God is making a command, "shall".
Would the command be for God's agent to commit another unjust killing or a just one? There is no doubt.
Only two Pope's, prior to Francis, found the death penalty inadmissible. One, or both, died outside the Church (fact check pending).
Further, finding against Pope Francis, is that his interpretation, which cannot be true, equates to God commanding unjust killings, which He would/could not do. To the contrary, we know that just executions will result in more innocents saved, by enhanced deterrence, enhanced incapacitation, enhanced probability and enhanced due process. (7-10).
======
The Pope’s Reign and Ruin
=====
Resolved: The Church identifies redress (aka justice and/or just retribution, collectively as "justice") as the primary reason for sanction, with God (Genesis 9:6), Jesus (St. Dismas) and the Holy Spirit (Ananias and Sapphira) providing us obvious examples of Holy Trinity guides, with many, many more, in fn 6. See Redress within CCC 2266.
Rationally and factually, the death penalty is a greater safeguard than either a life sentence or solitary confinement (7-10), all three of which Pope Francis opposes, making it clear that "safeguarding the common good" is, certainly, of no concern in refuting 2000 years of respected Church teachings (10A).
Error 2) Justice is primary and cannot be usurped.
"It has been recognized that the amended 2267 (1997 & later 2018) avoids the full Catholic teachings on the purposes of punishment, which are (a) defense of society against the criminal (7-10); (b) rehabilitation of the criminal (11) (c) retribution or the reparation of the disorder caused by the transgression (Sharp: "redress", aka justice or just retribution, within CCC 2266) . . . some authorities list (d) deterrence as a fourth purpose of punishment." (12) Cardinal Avery Dullesc (addl footnotes from Sharp)
======
“Capital Punishment and Magisterial Authority”
"Fastiggi on Capital Punishment and the Change to the Catechism,
Part I," Edward Feser, 8/26/2023,
Part 2, 8/30/2023
======
Error 3) The "extreme" description of the death penalty is humanist, in nature, not eternal, as is obvious, and has, never, been described as such, biblically. There is no biblical nor theological support for that term.
Not only has the Church considered the death penalty "appropriate", but, for over 2000 years, necessary and obligatory (all fn), in some cases, which the Church cannot, simply, make disappear, as She attempts and fails.
“Safeguarding the common good” is secondary or tertiary and cannot usurp that which is primary - justice, defined by the "appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes". Justice, being primary and with reason, that which protects and guarantees both "safeguarding the common good" and the
"appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes". Without justice, we have neither and without either, we have no justice.
The justice of the death penalty has not been usurped and cannot be, as the Church, post 1995, has tried to do and failed with Her weak and curious efforts, which are contrary to her own CCC, that is until She amends or deletes those contradictions.
By definition, a CCC cannot include contradictions and it, clearly, does.
"All interpretations, contrary to the biblical support of capital punishment, are false. Interpreters ought to listen to the Bible’s own agenda, rather than to squeeze from it implications for their own agenda. As the ancient rabbis taught, “Do not seek to be more righteous than your Creator.” (Ecclesiastes Rabbah 7.33.). Part of Synopsis of biblical scholar Lloyd R. Bailey’s book Capital Punishment: What the Bible Says, Abingdon Press, 1987.
St. Thomas Aquinas: “The fact that the evil, as long as they live, can be corrected from their errors does not prohibit the fact that they may be justly executed, for the danger which threatens from their way of life is greater and more certain than the good which may be expected from their improvement. They also have at that critical point of death the opportunity to be converted to God through repentance. And if they are so stubborn that even at the point of death their heart does not draw back from evil, it is possible to make a highly probable judgement that they would never come away from evil to the right use of their powers.” Summa Contra Gentiles, Book III, 146.
That shows deference to the innocent victims, the opposite of the Church's position (10A), which is so much, more, foul, in every criminal context, even more so in light of the ongoing context of the Church's contempt for the suffering of the innocents, in the priest sex abomination and, now, again (10A).
As Catholic theologian Steven Long places the arrow:
" . . . (it) is symptomatic of a society that can garner more support to spare the guilty than to save the innocent."
"The crowd still wants Barrabas." (13 & 10A)
This, also, equates to the priest sex scandal, in that the Church spared the guilty, thus harming more innocents, the same outcome as with EV and the amended 2267s (7-10A).
Error 4) The death penalty is a greater protector of the human rights of the guilty and the innocent and is a greater safeguard of the guilty and the innocent than are any lesser sanctions (7-10A), with Pope Francis, inexplicably, and by fact and reason, adding even more injury to the innocent, as he, also, opposes long sentences and solitary confinement, completing a trifecta of more death and other, additional harms to innocents, as is well known, to the Church, as to all (7-10A), with much more deference to the guilty unjust aggressors.
The death penalty/execution protects the innocent, in four ways, better, than does life without parole (LWOP) (7-10A) and, also, is a better safegurad than the release of unjust aggressors. The Church, as all of us, is aware (7-10A).
One would think that the Church, in light of the priest sex horrors, would have gained some compassion, in deference to the innocent over that of the unjust aggressors. She has not (10A).
======
30 Examples: How Death Penalty Abolitionists Value Murderers More Than Their Innocent Victims:
AKA - Full Rebuttal of Sir Richard Branson & His Death Penalty Comments
======
B) CCC 2267: “Today, however, there is a growing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes.”
Error 6) The awareness of the dignity of all persons has been factually, biblically and theologically, well, known and discussed since Genesis through Revelation, through Jesus and St. Dismas and from the beginnings of the Church through today.
There is no new nor growing awareness. The teachings have been clear and eternal, since the beginning of man. The Church "forgot"? Of course not.
The Church accepts knowing this with CCC 2261:
"The deliberate murder of an innocent person is gravely contrary to the dignity of the human being, to the golden rule, and to the holiness of the Creator.". . . not
yet, amended nor stricken from the CCC.
Error 7) The Church, inexplicably, transferred the "contrary to dignity", from the murder and the murderer, to the sanction, for those murders.
"Inexplicably" is way too soft . . . by reason, it is, downright, bizarre - a transfer, which is factually and rationally, impossible (all fn).
Catholic theologian Stephen Long on dignity & the death penalty:
The “dignitarian” premise . . .the assertion that we now understand human dignity better than did earlier epochs of the Church, especially in so far as we now know that felons retain human dignity despite their crimes.", " . . . it is both historically and doctrinally false to suggest that the Church has in the past failed to understand that unrepentant felons retain their natural human dignity." " . . . it is untrue that the Church has not properly understood human dignity until the modern period."
" . . . the Church has always affirmed, and has never denied, that the felon executed for a grave crime possesses human dignity, the imago dei ordered to, and specified by, noble goods in nature and grace."
"In the Catholic tradition, it is the dignity of the human person—not its denial—that undergirds the legitimacy of capital punishment."
"Genesis 9:6 identifies the imago dei as the very reason for the penalty: “Whosoever shall shed man’s blood, his blood shall be shed: for man was made to the image of God.”
"It is this dignity of the human person that guarantees that no earthly suffering, including the need to suffer death as a penalty for grave crime, can of itself prevent anyone from attaining the highest good of union with God. Human dignity also merits the sternest protective legal sanctions, potentially including the death penalty."(3), life without parole and solitary confinement, all opposed by Pope Francis, knowingly, causing more harm to innocents (7-10).
"The Church has also held that the human dignity of the innocent merits the most rigorous defense, potentially including punishment by death for those who wrongfully assail the human dignity of others." (3)
"Genesis 9:6 identifies the imago dei as the very reason for the penalty: “Whosoever shall shed man’s blood, his blood shall be shed: for man was made to the image of God.”
"It is this dignity of the human person that guarantees that no earthly suffering, including the need to suffer death as a penalty for grave crime, can of itself prevent anyone from attaining the highest good of union with God. Human dignity also merits the sternest protective legal sanctions, potentially including the death penalty."(3), life without parole and solitary confinement, all opposed by Pope Francis, knowingly, causing more harm to innocents (7-10).
"The Church has also held that the human dignity of the innocent merits the most rigorous defense, potentially including punishment by death for those who wrongfully assail the human dignity of others." (3)
Again, this is an affirmation on more deference to the innocent victims than to the guilty unjust aggressors, the opposite of the positions of the current Church and Sister Helen Prejean (7-10A, 14).
The Church's errors could, hardly, be more obvious, to the Church and so many others.
I suspect all in Catholic leadership, through today, are very aware, just as, shown, within this very CCC, which contradicts the 2018 Amendment, within the very same CCC. It is impossible not to recognize it.
The murderer is the one responsible for their own loss of dignity, as CCC 2261 agrees, which can, only, be re-established, by their own efforts, with the mercy of God, and which cannot be negated by execution, nor by any other sanction, as per Aquinas and reason and 2261, and execution may well be the more merciful, more medicinal sanction, by expiation, . . . as well known by the Church, as detailed:
Pope Pius XII: "When it is a question of the execution of a man condemned to death it is then reserved to the public power to deprive the condemned of the benefit of life, in expiation of his fault, when already, by his fault, he has dispossessed himself of the right to live." 9/14/52
The tragedy of this is that the Church must know it, as fact and reason is/should be, clearly, evident to Her, as with all others.
Romano Amerio, a consultant to the Preparatory Commission of Vatican II, a peritus (expert theologian) at the Council:
Some opposing capital punishment ". . . go on to assert that a life should not be ended because that would remove the possibility of making expiation, is to ignore the great truth that capital punishment is itself expiatory." (15)
"In a humanistic religion expiation would of course be primarily the converting of a man to other men. On that view, time is needed to effect a reformation, and the time available should not be shortened." (15)
"In God’s religion, on the other hand, expiation is primarily a recognition of the divine majesty and lordship, which can be and should be recognized at every moment, in accordance with the principle of the concentration of one’s moral life.” (15)
Humanism and other errors have infected the Chruch, on this topic, since EV, in 1995.
No sanction can take away the dignity of the unjust aggressor, nor does it. Only the ujust aggressor can do it to themselves, opposing God's will, with a sinful free will, as the Church confirms, within CCC 2261 and 2266, and as with:
It is clear, obvious, unambiguous.
"For the earnest believer, the derogation of the doctrinal patrimony of the Church on (the death penalty)—as though Scripture, tradition, the consensus of the Fathers, the teaching of Aquinas, and the teaching of all papacies up to the present had been swept away—is in its way as saddening as is the derogation of spiritual and moral integrity in the case of Theodore McCarrick." (3)
It has been proven that both SPJPII and Pope Benedict, as well as others in Church leadership, knew of the allegations against McCarrick and did nothing. This is what the faithful are struggling with . . . the Church, which, finally, admitted being sinful, knowingly, over a very long period of time, throughout the priest sex horrors, only confessing, after being exposed by outside sources, with the slow drip of new transgressions and coverups, again, being exposed by others, and expected to continue for decades (10A,16).
Popes knew of allegations against ex-Cardinal McCarrick years ago, report finds NBC NEWS, Nov. 10, 2020,
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/popes-knew-allegations-against-ex-cardinal-mccarrick-years-ago-report-n1247225
Sadly, consistent with the Church not acknowledging Her obvious errors, since 1995's EV and the 1997 CCC 2267 amendment, through today, harming more innocents (10A).
======
Lugo reviews some of the factual and rational errors, as well
Pope Francis and the Death Penalty
Luis E. Lugo, The Catholic Thing, SEPTEMBER 16, 2023,
======
"Capital Punishment: New Testament Teaching", Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J., 1998, www.therealpresence.org/archives/Sacred_Scripture/Sacred_Scripture_014.htm
D) CCC 2267: " . . . more effective detention systems have been developed, which ensure the fair protection of citizens . . .".
Error 9) Very well known as, factually, in error (7-10, 17) way before Evangelium Vitae (1995). From 1995, through today, the Church has intentionally, refused to look at the reality of criminal justice systems (7-10, 17), even though, repeatedly, asked to do so.
It is impossible that She does not know (16,17).
Executed unjust aggressors do not. No dispute. The Church concedes. So, why does She lie? Ask Her.
How and why the Church, intentionally, avoided this, from EV and forward, through today, within the CCC, is a very sad, moral mystery.
The Church is very well aware of repeat unjust aggressors (17), as She, secretly, Herself, oversaw such horrors within the priest sex abomination, until it was exposed, by others.
Yet, She still hid clear horrors, afterwards and, very likely, still, as proven with McCarrick and the recent (2023) France, Maryland and Illinois reports (16,17):
"Before the (outside) investigation, Illinois Catholic dioceses publicly listed only 103 substantiated child sex abusers." "By comparison, this report reveals the names and detailed information of 451 Catholic clerics and religious brothers who abused at least 1,997 children across all dioceses in the state of Illinois" . . .
With the abusers allowed to "hide in plain sight." (16), with more cover up (10A).
This is from 2023. The cover-up damn began to break in 1998 and exploded in 2008, 25 and 15 years earlier ($30 Million Awarded Men Molested by `Family Priest' / 3 bishops accused of Stockton coverup By Don Lattin, Chronicle Religion Writer, SFGate, July 17, 1998).
No one doubts that the Church cover-ups existed in 2023, just as they did from 1940 forward, with this disease still active, moving forward, requiring more outside the Church intervention, as the Church has proven Her untrustworthiness, not factually nor rationally doubted, by anyone.
Clement of Alexandria, Saint & Father of the Church (150-215)
"The Law, even in correcting and punishing, aims at the good of men. But when it sees any one in such a condition as to appear incurable, posting to the last stage of wickedness, then in its solicitude for the rest, that they may not be destroyed by it (just as if amputating a part from the whole body), it condemns such a one to death, as the course most conducive to health." The Stromata , Bk I, Ch 27
St. Thomas Aquinas: “The fact that the evil, as long as they live, can be corrected from their errors does not prohibit the fact that they may be justly executed, for the danger which threatens from their way of life is greater and more certain than the good which may be expected from their improvement. They also have at that critical point of death the opportunity to be converted to God through repentance. And if they are so stubborn that even at the point of death their heart does not draw back from evil, it is possible to make a highly probable judgement that they would never come away from evil to the right use of their powers.” Summa Contra Gentiles, Book III, 146.
The Church knows it, but Pope Francis is, somehow, unaware?! Impossible.
Error 10) The standard cannot be "more effective" nor "fair", neither of which is a standard, but must be, how best to protect the innocent from the unjust aggressors, which is a standard.
That is how irresponsible the Church is and has been, within the EV and the CCC, as She knows.
The Church should be very aware, as per Her priest sex horrors, but appears to have learned nothing.
The Church, somehow, finds that the world's criminal justice systems will be more caring and protective than the Church (at least 1940-2023), when the obvious, clear evidence is to the contrary (16,17), with Her detailed "requirement" and " grave duty" that "requires rendering the unjust aggressor unable to inflict harm", as detailed, in Her own CCC, but, intentionally, avoided by the Church, within Her CCC 2267 amendments.
CCC 2260 "The covenant between God and mankind is interwoven with reminders of God's gift of human life and man's murderous violence: For your lifeblood I will surely require a reckoning.... Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image. The Old Testament always considered blood a sacred sign of life. This teaching remains necessary for all time."
CCC 2266: "The State's effort to contain the spread of behaviors injurious to human rights and the fundamental rules of civil coexistence corresponds to the requirement of watching over the common good".
CCC 2265: "Legitimate defense can be not only a right but a grave duty for someone responsible for another's life. Preserving the common good requires rendering the unjust aggressor unable to inflict harm."
"requirement" "grave duty" "the common good" . . .
and "requires rendering the unjust aggressor unable to inflict harm" with, only, the death penalty capable of doing that, as the Church and all of us know. "This teaching remains necessary for all time."
and "requires rendering the unjust aggressor unable to inflict harm" with, only, the death penalty capable of doing that, as the Church and all of us know. "This teaching remains necessary for all time."
Could it be more obvious? Of course not. Possibly, the Church will remove all these pesky contradictions in Her next amendment. Watch.
To be, very clear, law, law enforcement, criminal justice and sanction are societies' "legitimate defense" against criminal activity, by unjust aggressors.
Of course, the Church knows it.
E) CCC 2267: “but, at the same time do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.”
We are all deprived of the possibility of redemption, if not redeemed, prior to our deaths, no matter what and when those deaths are, be it old age, cancer, murder, war, car wreck, execution, etc.
By reason, such is, totally, false, as is obvious to the Church and to all of us.
But Pope Francis is, somehow, unaware?!:
Pope Francis: "A punishment (the death penalty) that is not open to hope is not Christian and not human", during his sermon to the prisoners. "That is why the death penalty is neither human nor Christian."
The Pope is unaware that a Christian's death, no matter the manner of death, is always open to the greatest realization of Christianity's hope - their resurrection in Christ, an eternity of grace, paid for by the Passion of the Christ, through the punishment of death, the Perfect Sacrifice, the foundation for all Christianity, the pure manifestation of hope, an eternity in Christ, the reason Sister Prejean calls God an "ogre" (14) , but, instead, it is the eternal love of Jesus, the Holy Spirit and God, the foundation of Christianity.
Pope Francis is telling us, precisely, that he is unaware.
Using the Church's and Pope Francis' (lack of) reason, it is surprising that She and he have not accused God of curtailing our redemption, as He finds it proper that we all die because of sin.
By fact and reason, it is that simple and straight forward, with the Church and the Pope acting as if they are unaware.
"All interpretations, contrary to the biblical support of capital punishment, are false. Interpreters ought to listen to the Bible’s own agenda, rather than to squeeze from it implications for their own agenda. As the ancient rabbis taught, “Do not seek to be more righteous than your Creator.” (Ecclesiastes Rabbah 7.33.). Part of Synopsis of Professor Lloyd R. Bailey’s book Capital Punishment: What the Bible Says, Abingdon Press, 1987.
ERROR 12: As is obvious, throughout, death penalty abolition cannot be in the light of the Gospel, but is contrary to it, as proven within the very same CCC, as well as by reason.
AN APPEAL TO THE CARDINALS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH (18)
" . . . to teach that capital punishment is always and intrinsically evil would contradict Scripture. That the death penalty can be a legitimate means of securing retributive justice is affirmed in Genesis 9:6 and many other biblical texts, and the Church holds that Scripture cannot teach moral error." (18)
"The legitimacy in principle of capital punishment is also the consistent teaching of the magisterium for two millennia." (18)
"To contradict Scripture and tradition on this point would cast doubt on the credibility of the magisterium in general." (18)
"The legitimacy in principle of capital punishment is also the consistent teaching of the magisterium for two millennia." (18)
"To contradict Scripture and tradition on this point would cast doubt on the credibility of the magisterium in general." (18)
" . . . the decree of Genesis 9:5-6 is equally enduring and cannot be separated from the other pledges and instructions of its immediate context, Genesis 8:20-9:17; . . . that is true unless specific Biblical authority can be cited for the deletion, of which there appears to be none. It seems strange that any opponents of capital punishment who professes to recognize the authority of the Bible either overlook or disregard the divine decree in this covenant with Noah; . . . capital punishment should be recognized . . . as the divinely instituted penalty for murder; The basis of this decree . . . is as enduring as God; . . . murder not only deprives a man of a portion of his earthly life . . . it is a further sin against him as a creature made in the image of God and against God Himself whose image the murderer does not respect." (4) Biblical scholar Dr. Gervas A. Carey
CCC 2265: "Preserving the common good "requires" rendering the unjust aggressor unable to inflict harm."
Execution is the only way to render "the unjust aggressor unable to inflict harm" (17). There is no other way, as countless innocents have been harmed by repeat unjust aggressors, as the Church well knows, not only as a matter of fact (17), but also as an accomplice (16). I guess the Church will have to remove or amend CCC 2265, as all of the others.
CCC 2260: "For your lifeblood I (God) will surely require a reckoning.... Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for God made man in his own image." "This teaching remains necessary for all time."
"surely require", "shall" and "remains necessary for all time". All eternal scripture. Not optional and, very, clear to the Church, as to all.
" . . . to teach that capital punishment is always and intrinsically evil would contradict Scripture. That the death penalty can be a legitimate means of securing retributive justice is affirmed in Genesis 9:6 and many other biblical texts, and the Church holds that Scripture cannot teach moral error." (18)
The Church "missed" it? Of course not.
12 clear errors in CCC 2267, therefore invalid.
EV (1995) and the amendments of CCC 2267 (1997, 2018) have been sloppy, irresponsible, contra reason and chilling, just as 2264, below.
With the Church, there is this pattern:
" . . . (it) is symptomatic of a society that can garner more support to spare the guilty than to save the innocent."
"The crowd still wants Barrabas." (13)
==================
EXTRA
13th & 14th Error - CCC 2264
The earlier version had this:
"If a man in self-defense uses more than necessary violence, it will be unlawful: whereas if he repels force with moderation, his defense will be lawful....".
Error 13) It reflects nothing but willful ignorance. The Church had no clue as to self-defense and cared not about learning about it. Multiple gunshot wounds, or other, have not stopped unjust aggressors from continuing harm.
Some deference to the innocent is required. The Church showed none.
Then this addition, later, reflecting that observation, a little late and, still, it is irrational.
"Nor is it necessary for salvation that a man omit the act of moderate self-defense to avoid killing the other man, since one is bound to take more care of one's own life than of another's."
Error 14) This is, also, a clear error.
It is not because "one is bound to take more care of one's own life than of another's."
The error is clear, as this example:
"one (the unjust aggressor) is bound to take more care of one's own life than of another's (the innocent victim)."
This was allowed because the Church used no critical thinking, in
creating the amendment, which should be impossible, but which occurred, seamlessly, with all of Her other errors.
Rationally, instead, it should reflect this:
"within self-defense, the saving of innocent life is required over that of saving the life of the unjust aggressor."
That is moral self-defense. The Church? Clueless? Impossible. Then, why? Because She is concerned with protecting the guilty, at the expense of more innocents harmed, as with the priest sex horrors (10A).
The lack of moral clarity and reason, within the current 2264, is contrary to a CCC.
The Church continues Her lack of deference to the innocent, even though the CCC requires it.
With the Church, there is this pattern:
" . . . (it) is symptomatic of a society that can garner more support to spare the guilty than to save the innocent."
"The crowd still wants Barrabas." (13 & 10A)
======
more here:
BISHOPS HIDE TRUTH FROM THEIR FLOCK: DEATH PENALTY
Additional readings by Catholic Scholars
POPE FRANCIS AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT,
by Edward Feser, First Things, 8 /3 /2018,
"Pope’s change to Catechism contradicts natural law and the deposit of Faith: This is Pope Francis's boldest and most reckless move to date",
Peter Kwasniewski, Lifesite News, Aug 2, 2018,
"What was black is now white: Pope "changes Catechism" to declare death penalty 'inadmissible in all cases' ", Bergoglian Milestones, Rorate Cafli, International Traditionall Catholic WebLog,
CARDINAL DULLES’S DUBIA, Michael Pakaluk, First Things, 8 /6/2018
Pope Francis and the death penalty: a change in doctrine or circumstances?, Ed Condon, CNA, 8/3/2018
SOME RESPONSES TO POPE FRANCIS'S REVISION OF CCC 2267 :
Thomistica, The Sacra Doctinal Projects
What Is Bergoglianism?, Chris Ferrara, The Fatima Center, DECEMBER 4, 2019,
Ferrara, President & Chief Counsel of the American Catholic Lawyers Association.
The Legitimacy of Capital Punishment, by Fr. John A. Hardon, S.J.,
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?id=6871&repos=1&subrepos=0&searchid=1486390
Topic 34: Fifth Commandment, Opus Dei,
======
FN
Research, with fact checking, vetting, below, with all sources provided.
1) Pope John Paul II: His death penalty errors,
October 1997, updated through 2023
2) Kevin L. Flannery S.J., Consultor of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, appointed by SPJPII (2) “Capital Punishment and the Law”, Ave Maria Law Review, 2007 (30 pp),
https://avemarialaw-law-review.avemarialaw.edu/Content/articles/V5i2.flannery.copyright.pdf 3) Magisterial Irresponsibility, Steven Long, First Things, 10/18
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/10/magisterial-irresponsibility
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2018/10/magisterial-irresponsibility
4) (p. 111-113). Quaker Scholar Dr. Gervas A. Carey. A Professor of Bible and past President of George Fox College, "A Bible Study", from Essays on the Death Penalty, T. Robert Ingram, ed., St. Thomas Press, Houston, 1963, 1992.
5) Dr. J. Budziszewski, Catholic Scholar, Jan. 25, 2002 conference, Pew Forum, titled "A Call for Reckoning: Religion and the Death Penalty"
6) Religion and the Death Penalty
Jesus and the Death Penalty
New Testament Death Penalty Support Overwhelming
7) The Death Penalty: Saving More Innocent Lives
and
Catechism & State Protection
and
see a human rights violation, within
Moral Hypocrisy: European Union & The US Death Penalty
8) Deterrence, Death Penalties & Executions
9) The Super Due Process Protections: Texas Death Penalty Procedures
10) The Death Row "Exonerated"/"Innocent" Frauds
71-83% Error Rate in Death Row "Innocent" Claims,
Well Known Since 2000
10A) 30 Examples: How Death Penalty Abolitionists Value Murderers More Than Their Innocent Victims:
AKA - Full Rebuttal of Sir Richard Branson & His Death Penalty Comments
11) The Death Penalty: Mercy, Expiation, Redemption & Salvation
12) Cardinal Avery Dulles, "Catholicism and Capital Punishment"]."The Purpose of Punishment (in the Catholic tradition)", by Canon Lawyer R. Michael Dunningan, J.D., J.C.L., CHRISTIFIDELIS, Vol.21,No.4, Sept 14, 2003)
13) Four Catholic Journals Indulge in (anti death penalty) Doctrinal Solipsism,Steven Long, THOMISTICA, March 5, 2015,
14) Sister Helen Prejean: Her Lies, Deceptions and/or Astounding Willful Ignorance? - A Compilation
and
Does Truth Matter? Sr. Prejean, The Church & U of Notre Dame
15) “Amerio on capital punishment “, Chapter XXVI, 187. The death penalty, from the book Iota Unum, May 25, 2007, www.domid.blogspot.com/2007/05/amerio-on-capital-punishment.html
Amerio, a professor at the Academy of Lugano, faithful Catholic Vatican insider, adviser at Vatican II
16) France's Catholic Church had 3,000 child abusers, finds independent investigation, The Associated Press, October 3, 2021
Opinion The Catholic Church’s sex abuse scandal continues, Editorial Board , Washington Post, 11/13/2022,
Nearly 2,000 children in Illinois were sexually abused by Catholic clergy, state finds,
17) Catechism & State Protection
18) AN APPEAL TO THE CARDINALS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, various esteemed religious authors, First Things, 8/15/18
======
600+ pro death penalty quotes from murder victim's families &
3300+ from some of the greatest thinkers in history
======
Victim Services
Victims' Voices
======
Additional research, w/sources, w/fact checking/vetting & critical thinking, as required of everyone.
The Death Penalty: Justice & Saving More Innocents
and
Students, Academics & Journalists: Death Penalty Research
======
Partial CV
NOTE: I am not a Catholic, nor a biblical scholar, nor a theologian, but have been studying the works of those who are, since 1995.
======
addl bcc: (primarily) Catholic institutions, worldwide
Ignatian Solitary Network , Glenmary Challenge Magazine, Catholic Review, Archdiocese of Boston, The Compass, The Sentinal, Roman Catholic Communicators of Canada, Novalis Publishing Archdioces of St.Louis & St.Louis Review, Our Northland Diocese & Diocese of Crookston, Catholic New York, Archdiocese of Detroit & Detroit Catholic. ONE Magazine, Religion Unplugged (The Media Project), Archdioces of Lousiville, Global Pulse, UCA NEWS, Twenty-Third Publications, Archdiocese of Detroit, Eureka Street, The Acton Institute, The Word On Fire, Holy See Mission, The Witherspoon Institute, University of the Incarnate Word, Diocese of Fort Worth, La Croix International, People of Praise, Nebraska Catholic Bishops (staff and parishes), Creighton U., Seton High School (Students & Teachers, Bladensburg, MD), The Catholic Weekly (Australia), Archdiocese of Oklahoma City, Catholic Conference of Oklahoma, Diocese of Salt Lake City, Arizona Catholic Conference, Religious News Assoc., Diocese of Green Bay, Rev. Harry D. Gatewood, M.Div., Louisiana Catholic Diocese (Bishops and staff), The Fellowship of Catholic University Students (FOCUS), Catholic Digest, Catholic Journal, Today's (SA) Catholic, US Catholic, The Catholic Weekly, Crisis Magazine, FAITH Magazine, Catholic Telegraph, The Irish Catholic, Archdiocese of Seattle, NW Catholic, Zenit, NZ Catholic, The Central Minnesota Catholic, The Catholic Network, The Universe Catholic Weekly, Broadview, Duke Divinity School. Religion Unplugged, The Associated Church Press, The Christian Recorder, PCUSA.org, Prison Fellowship, Pennsylvania Prison Society, Archdiocese of Miami, Augustinian Defenders of the Rights of the Poor (ADROP), Order of Malta, Catholic Prison Ministries Coalition, Virginia Catholic Conference & Diocese of Richmond, All Students & Teachers St. Joseph's Academy (Baton Rouge) , Loyola U., Holy Trinity Catholic Church (Washington DC), Archdiocese of San Antonio, DeSales Media Group & Diocese of Brooklyn, RENEW Intl., Angelus News, FloridaCatholic, Catholic Standard and Archdiocese of Washington DC, Oklahoma Diocese, Where Peter Is, The Wanderer, Nebraska Diocese, The Dialog & Diocese of Wilmington, Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston, Catholic Herald, Catholic Philly & Philadelphia Archdiocese, Intermountain Catholic & Diocese of Salt Lake City, Opus Dei, Notre Dame Observer, Diocese of Raleigh, Diocese of Scranton, Renew Intl., Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), Archdiocese of Cincinnati, Catholic League, The Sisters of Saint Dominic (Blauvelt, New York), The Catholic Telegraph, Church Militant, The Catholic Sun, New Advent, The (Fordham U) Observer, St. Patrick Catholic Community (Scottsdale, Az.), Diocese of St. Cloud, Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Diocese of Tucson, Catholic Daughters of America, The Record & Archdiocese of Louisville, The Archdiocese of Los Angeles, many more
University of Notre Dame Institutions
Exoneration Justice Clinic (Notre Dame Law School), Klau Institute of Civil and Human Rights, G. Marcus Cole, Dean, Notre Dame Law School, ND's de Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture, ND's Tocqueville Program for Inquiry into Religion and Public Life, ND's Program on Church, State & Society, All Professors, Notre Dame Law School, ND's Center for Social Concerns, Gallivan Journalism Program, ND Debate Team, ND's Dept. Of Theology, Notre Dame Magazine, The (ND) Observer, Notre Dame News, WSND Radio-FM,
and South Bend Tribune and AWAKE
